Calgary Herald Editorial
Saturday, May 13, 2006
A final showdown over the future of the storied Hart house is expected to take place Monday at City Hall (CHI note - this was put over to June 19 to allow changes to the plan and to allow one last chance for the provincial heritage authorities to intervene) . Neighbours are fighting to stop the approval of a special development plan that would let the new owner build more townhouses -- with a higher density -- than is permitted under the area's zoning.
On the surface, it seems the neighbours have a valid point. Why should owner Dario Berloni be given special privileges? The city's planning commission has approved rezoning of the nearly one-hectare property to allow 20 townhouses, instead of the maximum 12.
The commission now wants council to give final approval, following a public hearing on Monday. Council should do just that, mainly because Berloni has agreed to save the historic landmark. He plans on restoring the 1905 building to a single-family home. Such a project is costly, with little upside economically. Berloni has said the profit from the higher density development will go toward the restoration.
As well, he has shown a spirit of co-operation, scaling back his original development plan from about 40 townhouses to 20, and now has agreed to build only 16 -- just four more than the zoning permits.
The neighbours are getting worked up over four more townhouses. The real issue here is why the city has to negotiate with developers in order to save heritage properties. Under the Alberta Historical Resources Act, the city has the authority to designate and protect any property it deems of significant heritage value.
There's no disputing the significance of the Hart property. It was built by businessman Edward Crandell in 1905, used by the Red Cross for orphaned and convalescent children following the First World War, and was later purchased by Judge Henry Patterson. And then, Stampede wrestling patriarch Stu Hart bought it in 1951.
Under the Heritage Act, the city must compensate owners for loss in economic value. It's often difficult for two parties to agree on what that economic value might be. To get around this, the city only designates properties once it has consent from the owner, usually offering incentives such as grants, special rezoning status and, in the case of the Lougheed House, a freeze on property taxes.
Unless the province changes the law to remove the compensation clause -- as happened recently in Ontario -- the city has done the best it can.
And the Hart house lives on. Sometimes, a compromise is the best deal -- often the only one --to be reached.Statistics: Posted by newsposter — Sat May 13, 2006 11:39 am
]]>